Public competitive baseline
Paragon 28 is making the shortlist. AI still isn’t consistently giving buyers a reason to prefer it.
That is not a visibility problem. It is a preference problem.
Based on 10 answers from 1 of 5 assistants, recorded by us before contacting you — nothing here came from your team. The full record behind it is complete and available to you.
Not what you expected?
Every prompt, answer and source behind this page is on record.
If something here looks wrong, we will walk your team through how it was
recorded — question by question.
Ask us to show the record →
The question a buyer asked
“Is Paragon 28 a good choice for regulated medical devices?”
Paragon 28 was the recommended choice in this answer.
The buyer is still forming a view of the market at this point.
consideration
Read the full answer the buyer would see
Paragon 28 is a company that specializes in developing and manufacturing orthopedic devices, particularly for the foot and ankle. When considering whether Paragon 28 is a good choice for regulated medical devices, several factors should be taken into account:
1. **Regulatory Compliance**: Paragon 28 is known for adhering to regulatory standards set by agencies such as the FDA in the United States and other international regulatory bodies. Their products are designed to meet the necessary safety and efficacy requirements.
2. **Product Range**: The company offers a variety of products, including implants, instruments, and biologics, specifically tailored for foot and ankle procedures. This specialization can be beneficial for healthcare providers looking for targeted solutions.
3. **Innovation**: Paragon 28 is recognized for its innovative approach to orthopedic solutions, often incorporating advanced materials and designs that can improve patient outcomes.
4. **Reputation and Reviews**: The company has built a reputation within the orthopedic community, and feedback from healthcare professionals can provide insights into the effectiveness and reliability of their products.
5. **Support and Education**: Paragon 28 often provides educational resources and support for healthcare providers, which can be an important factor when choosing a supplier for medical devices.
Ultimately, whether Paragon 28 is a good choice for regulated medical devices will depend on specific needs, the type of procedures being performed, and the preferences of the healthcare providers involved. It is advisable to conduct thorough research, including consulting with medical professionals and reviewing clinical data, before making a decision.
ChatGPT · gpt-4o-mini · 2026-08-24
Where Paragon 28 stops moving
Across the 10 answers recorded in this baseline.
Paragon 28 appears in 1 answers and is carried through to a recommendation in none of them.
AI is talking about Paragon 28 without citing Paragon 28.
Every answer we recorded, and where it came from.
1
answers that describe Paragon 28 to a buyer
→
0
of them cite an official Paragon 28 source
If AI is going to explain your company to a buyer,
whose version of the facts is it using?
Two more questions we recorded
Ranked by how close each sits to a purchase decision.
“What is the best regulated medical devices provider?”
Paragon 28 never came up in this answer.
Determining the "best" regulated medical devices provider can be subjective and depends on various factors, including the specific type of medical device, the region, regulatory compliance, innovation, quality, and customer service. Some of the leading companies in the medical devices sector known for their regulatory compliance and quality include:
1. **Medtronic** - A global leader in medical technology, Medtronic offers a wide range of products and therapies for various medical conditions.
2. **Johnson & Johnson (Ethicon, DePuy Synthes)** - Known for surgical devices and orthopedic products, J&J has a strong reputation for quality and innovation.
3. **Boston Scientific** - Specializes in less invasive medical devices for various fields, including cardiology, urology, and endoscopy.
4. **Abbott Laboratories** - Offers a range of medical devices, particularly in diagnostics, cardiovascular, and diabetes care.
5. **Siemens Healthineers** - Focuses on diagnostic imaging and laboratory diagnostics, known for high-quality imaging devices.
6. **Stryker Corporation** - Known for its surgical equipment and orthopedic devices, Stryker is recognized for innovation and quality.
7. **Philips Healthcare** - Offers a wide range of medical devices, particularly in imaging and patient monitoring.
When evaluating a medical device provider, consider factors such as product range, regulatory history, customer reviews, and the specific needs of your healthcare setting. It's also advisable to consult healthcare professionals or industry experts for recommendations tailored to your specific requirements.
ChatGPT · 2026-08-24
“Which regulated medical devices platform would you recommend for an enterprise?”
Paragon 28 never came up in this answer.
When considering a regulated medical devices platform for an enterprise, several factors come into play, including compliance with regulatory standards (like FDA, ISO 13485, and EU MDR), scalability, integration capabilities, and user-friendliness. Here are a few platforms that are commonly recommended for enterprises in the medical device sector:
1. **MasterControl**: This platform is known for its comprehensive quality management system (QMS) that helps companies manage compliance and quality processes. It supports document control, training management, and CAPA processes, making it suitable for regulated environments.
2. **Veeva Vault**: Veeva offers a cloud-based platform that provides solutions for content management and quality management in life sciences. It is particularly strong in document management and regulatory submissions.
3. **Greenlight Guru**: Specifically designed for medical device companies, Greenlight Guru offers a QMS that is compliant with FDA and ISO standards. It focuses on simplifying the product development process and ensuring regulatory compliance.
4. **TrackWise**: A robust QMS solution from Sparta Systems, TrackWise is designed for regulated industries and offers extensive capabilities for managing quality processes, including CAPA, change control, and audit management.
5. **Arena PLM**: Arena offers product lifecycle management (PLM) solutions that cater to medical device companies. It helps manage product data, compliance documentation, and collaboration across teams.
6. **QMS by ETQ**: ETQ offers a flexible QMS solution that can be tailored to meet the specific needs of medical device manufacturers. It includes modules for document control, training, and risk management.
7. **Oracle Agile PLM**: This platform provides a comprehensive solution for product lifecycle management, including compliance management for regulated industries. It integrates well with other Oracle applications.
When selecting a platform, it's essential to evaluate your specific needs, including the size of your organization, the complexity of your products, and your existing technology stack. Additionally, consider conducting demos and seeking feedback from current users to ensure the platform aligns with your operational requirements.
ChatGPT · 2026-08-24
Your platform measures the outcome.
We work on what produces it.
You already know where you stand. What
measurement does not show is what the answer was assembled from.
Measure
- Visibility
- Mentions
- Competitor position
- Trends
What we work on
- Which facts about you an assistant can find
- Whether they come from a source it will use
- Where your own version is missing from the answer
- How that changes across the questions that matter
What decides the answer
Nobody tells an assistant which sources to trust. It decides that
on every single answer — and the only thing you control is what it finds
about you when it looks.
What it reads
Third-party write-ups, retailer pages, forums, review sites —
10 of the 10 answers we recorded were built this way.
What it doesn’t
Your own published facts. Across this baseline, an official
Paragon 28 source was cited 0 times.
What that means
The version of Paragon 28 a buyer hears is assembled from other
people’s descriptions of you, not from yours.
This is the part your monitoring platform reports on but does not
reach. We work on the layer underneath it: which facts about Paragon 28 are
available to an assistant, in what form, from a source it will actually use.
What you actually get
Not a report and not a dashboard of scores. A maintained layer of
facts about Paragon 28 that an assistant can find, plus the record of what
it does with them.
/fact-center
Facts, with their state
Product line & categories
verified
Certifications held
verified
Positioning vs alternatives
needs review
Pricing & availability
not published
/company/paragon 28
Machine-readable profile
.jsonld.yaml
.md.txt
.html
Structured factslive
Verification statelive
Recent changeslive
/monitoring
What the answers do next
“Is Paragon 28 a good choice for regulated medical de…”
tracked
10answers on record
0
cite you today
So: software, not a report. The record you see on this page
is the starting point. What you run afterwards is a maintained fact layer for
Paragon 28 and continuous monitoring of what assistants do with it.
456 / 1,501
company domains we scanned already publish a machine-readable
fact layer or explicit rules for AI systems
Measuring and managing are two different jobs
Measuring tells you the score. It does
not change what the score is calculated from. Both matter — and only one
of them is something you can act on.
Paragon 28 publishes no fact layer and no rules for AI systems. Everything an assistant says about you today, it assembled without you.
What your team takes into a budget review
01
The answers themselves
Quotable, each with its date and the assistant that
produced it.
02
The source gap
1 answers describe Paragon 28;
0 of them cite Paragon 28.
03
Where the brand stops moving
Mentioned 1 → recommended
0 → preferred 1.
04
What is actually controllable
Which facts about Paragon 28 an assistant can reach,
and which it cannot.
Every line above traces back to a recorded answer with a
timestamp and a provider — which is what holds up in a review, unlike a
score whose method nobody can see.
The uncomfortable part
You already have the
score. If a competitor keeps winning the same commercial questions:
- Do you know why?
- Can you change one thing without changing everything else?
- Can you prove that it moved the outcome?
- Can you repeat it?
If the answer is no, that is a reporting system, not a
growth system.
Fix what assistants say about you
Every prompt, every answer in full, every source behind it, broken down by
assistant. It is a record about Paragon 28, so we release it to a
verified paragon28.com address rather than publishing it.
Fix this →
The record stays with your team. Keep Profound, Scrunch, Peec, Semrush or
whatever you use now — this works on the layer underneath what they
measure, and does not replace them.
Who sees this record
Released to a verified paragon28.com address only. Not
indexed, not published, not shared with third parties.
Built for regulated work
We already run this method for FDA- and FCC-regulated
manufacturers, where a claim about a product has to survive scrutiny.
Every claim is traceable
Each statement links to the answer it came from, with the
provider and the timestamp. Nothing here is a modelled estimate.
Assistants in this baseline
ChatGPT10 answers recorded
ClaudeNot included in this run
GeminiNot included in this run
PerplexityNot included in this run
GrokNot included in this run
Running your own prompt set covers all 5 — request full coverage.
AuthorityPrompt
We maintain the layer of verified company facts that AI
assistants read, and we track what they say afterwards.
Where we are
AuthorityPrompt is now in ChatGPT and Codex
Security
- SOC 2
- SSO for team accounts
- Data encrypted in transit and at rest
Your record
- Released to verified company domains only
- Never indexed or resold
- Deleted on request
How this was measured
| Buying questions | 10 |
| Answers recorded | 10 |
| Requests attempted | 50 |
| Assistants that answered | ChatGPT |
| Recorded | 2026-08-24 21:13 UTC |
Every answer is reproduced as the assistant returned it at the time shown,
with the classification shown next to the answer it came from — so your
team can check it line by line, and quote it where a number without a method
would not hold up. Each answer carries the assistant, the date and the
sources it drew on, so a business case can be built on the record rather
than on an estimate.
Independent AuthorityPrompt profile based on publicly available sources. This company has not claimed or verified this profile and is not an AuthorityPrompt customer.