Public competitive baseline
On Purpose is making the shortlist. AI still isn’t consistently giving buyers a reason to prefer it.
That is not a visibility problem. It is a preference problem.
Based on 10 answers from 1 of 5 assistants, recorded by us before contacting you — nothing here came from your team. The full record behind it is complete and available to you.
Not what you expected?
Every prompt, answer and source behind this page is on record.
If something here looks wrong, we will walk your team through how it was
recorded — question by question.
Ask us to show the record →
The question a buyer asked
“Is On Purpose a good choice for communications consultant?”
On Purpose was the recommended choice in this answer.
The buyer is still forming a view of the market at this point.
consideration
Read the full answer the buyer would see
On Purpose is a well-regarded organization that focuses on helping individuals and organizations align their purpose with their business strategies. If you're considering them for communications consulting, it would be beneficial to evaluate a few key factors:
1. **Expertise**: Look into their experience and expertise in communications specifically. While they may have a strong focus on purpose-driven strategies, ensure they have a solid background in communications.
2. **Client Testimonials**: Research reviews or testimonials from previous clients to gauge their effectiveness and the quality of their services.
3. **Services Offered**: Ensure that the specific services you need (e.g., branding, public relations, internal communications) are part of their offerings.
4. **Alignment with Your Goals**: Consider whether their approach aligns with your organization's values and objectives.
5. **Case Studies**: If available, review case studies that demonstrate their success in similar projects or industries.
Ultimately, whether On Purpose is a good choice for you will depend on your specific needs and how well their expertise aligns with those needs.
ChatGPT · gpt-4o-mini · 2026-08-28
Where On Purpose stops moving
Across the 10 answers recorded in this baseline.
On Purpose appears in 1 answers and is carried through to a recommendation in none of them.
AI is talking about On Purpose without citing On Purpose.
Every answer we recorded, and where it came from.
1
answers that describe On Purpose to a buyer
→
0
of them cite an official On Purpose source
If AI is going to explain your company to a buyer,
whose version of the facts is it using?
Two more questions we recorded
Ranked by how close each sits to a purchase decision.
“What is the best communications consultant provider?”
On Purpose never came up in this answer.
Choosing the "best" communications consultant provider can depend on various factors, including your specific needs, industry, budget, and location. Some well-regarded communications consulting firms include:
1. **Edelman** - Known for public relations and communications strategies.
2. **FleishmanHillard** - Offers a wide range of services, including PR, digital marketing, and reputation management.
3. **Burson Cohn & Wolfe (BCW)** - Focuses on integrated communications and public relations.
4. **Weber Shandwick** - Specializes in PR and digital communications.
5. **Ketchum** - Known for its strategic communications and marketing services.
For smaller businesses or specific needs, local or niche firms may be more suitable. It's essential to evaluate potential providers based on their expertise, client testimonials, case studies, and alignment with your goals. Consider scheduling consultations to discuss your needs and see how they propose to help you.
ChatGPT · 2026-08-28
“Which communications consultant platform would you recommend for an enterprise?”
On Purpose never came up in this answer.
Choosing a communications consultant platform for an enterprise depends on various factors, including the specific needs of your organization, budget, and the features you require. Here are a few well-regarded platforms that cater to enterprise-level communications:
1. **Slack**: While primarily known as a messaging platform, Slack offers integrations with various tools and can serve as a central hub for team communication. It’s particularly useful for real-time collaboration.
2. **Microsoft Teams**: Part of the Microsoft 365 suite, Teams integrates seamlessly with other Microsoft applications. It offers chat, video conferencing, and file sharing, making it suitable for enterprises already using Microsoft products.
3. **Zoom**: Known for its video conferencing capabilities, Zoom also offers chat and webinar features. It’s a solid choice for organizations that prioritize virtual meetings and events.
4. **Cisco Webex**: This platform provides robust video conferencing and collaboration tools, making it suitable for enterprises with a focus on security and scalability.
5. **Asana**: While primarily a project management tool, Asana includes communication features that help teams collaborate on tasks and projects effectively.
6. **Trello**: Similar to Asana, Trello is a project management tool that allows teams to communicate and collaborate on tasks visually.
7. **Monday.com**: This platform combines project management with communication features, allowing teams to collaborate on projects while keeping track of progress.
8. **Hootsuite or Sprout Social**: If your enterprise requires social media management, these platforms can help manage communications across various social channels.
9. **Salesforce Chatter**: For organizations already using Salesforce, Chatter provides a social network for employees to collaborate and communicate effectively.
10. **Workplace by Facebook**: This platform offers familiar social media-like features for enterprise communication, making it easy for employees to connect and collaborate.
When selecting a platform, consider factors such as user interface, integration capabilities, scalability, security features, and customer support. It may also be beneficial to request demos or trials to see which platform best fits your organization's needs.
ChatGPT · 2026-08-28
Your platform measures the outcome.
We work on what produces it.
You already know where you stand. What
measurement does not show is what the answer was assembled from.
Measure
- Visibility
- Mentions
- Competitor position
- Trends
What we work on
- Which facts about you an assistant can find
- Whether they come from a source it will use
- Where your own version is missing from the answer
- How that changes across the questions that matter
What decides the answer
Nobody tells an assistant which sources to trust. It decides that
on every single answer — and the only thing you control is what it finds
about you when it looks.
What it reads
Third-party write-ups, retailer pages, forums, review sites —
10 of the 10 answers we recorded were built this way.
What it doesn’t
Your own published facts. Across this baseline, an official
On Purpose source was cited 0 times.
What that means
The version of On Purpose a buyer hears is assembled from other
people’s descriptions of you, not from yours.
This is the part your monitoring platform reports on but does not
reach. We work on the layer underneath it: which facts about On Purpose are
available to an assistant, in what form, from a source it will actually use.
What you actually get
Not a report and not a dashboard of scores. A maintained layer of
facts about On Purpose that an assistant can find, plus the record of what
it does with them.
/fact-center
Facts, with their state
Product line & categories
verified
Certifications held
verified
Positioning vs alternatives
needs review
Pricing & availability
not published
/company/on purpose
Machine-readable profile
.jsonld.yaml
.md.txt
.html
Structured factslive
Verification statelive
Recent changeslive
/monitoring
What the answers do next
“Is On Purpose a good choice for communications consu…”
tracked
10answers on record
0
cite you today
So: software, not a report. The record you see on this page
is the starting point. What you run afterwards is a maintained fact layer for
On Purpose and continuous monitoring of what assistants do with it.
456 / 1,501
company domains we scanned already publish a machine-readable
fact layer or explicit rules for AI systems
Measuring and managing are two different jobs
Measuring tells you the score. It does
not change what the score is calculated from. Both matter — and only one
of them is something you can act on.
On Purpose already publishes a fact layer. The question is whether it says what you would want it to say.
What your team takes into a budget review
01
The answers themselves
Quotable, each with its date and the assistant that
produced it.
02
The source gap
1 answers describe On Purpose;
0 of them cite On Purpose.
03
Where the brand stops moving
Mentioned 1 → recommended
0 → preferred 1.
04
What is actually controllable
Which facts about On Purpose an assistant can reach,
and which it cannot.
Every line above traces back to a recorded answer with a
timestamp and a provider — which is what holds up in a review, unlike a
score whose method nobody can see.
The uncomfortable part
You already have the
score. If a competitor keeps winning the same commercial questions:
- Do you know why?
- Can you change one thing without changing everything else?
- Can you prove that it moved the outcome?
- Can you repeat it?
If the answer is no, that is a reporting system, not a
growth system.
Fix what assistants say about you
Every prompt, every answer in full, every source behind it, broken down by
assistant. It is a record about On Purpose, so we release it to a
verified onpurposecomms.com address rather than publishing it.
Fix this →
The record stays with your team. Keep Profound, Scrunch, Peec, Semrush or
whatever you use now — this works on the layer underneath what they
measure, and does not replace them.
Who sees this record
Released to a verified onpurposecomms.com address only. Not
indexed, not published, not shared with third parties.
Built for regulated work
We already run this method for FDA- and FCC-regulated
manufacturers, where a claim about a product has to survive scrutiny.
Every claim is traceable
Each statement links to the answer it came from, with the
provider and the timestamp. Nothing here is a modelled estimate.
Assistants in this baseline
ChatGPT10 answers recorded
ClaudeNot included in this run
GeminiNot included in this run
PerplexityNot included in this run
GrokNot included in this run
Running your own prompt set covers all 5 — request full coverage.
AuthorityPrompt
We maintain the layer of verified company facts that AI
assistants read, and we track what they say afterwards.
Where we are
AuthorityPrompt is now in ChatGPT and Codex
Security
- SOC 2
- SSO for team accounts
- Data encrypted in transit and at rest
Your record
- Released to verified company domains only
- Never indexed or resold
- Deleted on request
How this was measured
| Buying questions | 10 |
| Answers recorded | 10 |
| Requests attempted | 50 |
| Assistants that answered | ChatGPT |
| Recorded | 2026-08-28 23:41 UTC |
Every answer is reproduced as the assistant returned it at the time shown,
with the classification shown next to the answer it came from — so your
team can check it line by line, and quote it where a number without a method
would not hold up. Each answer carries the assistant, the date and the
sources it drew on, so a business case can be built on the record rather
than on an estimate.
Independent AuthorityPrompt profile based on publicly available sources. This company has not claimed or verified this profile and is not an AuthorityPrompt customer.