Verify Corporate Facts Against SEC Disclosures
Compare AI-generated corporate claims with traceable SEC EDGAR records. Preserve filing identifiers and the evidence behind each comparison.
For Public company Investor Relations, Legal, Compliance and Corporate Communications
Incorrect claims about corporate disclosures, leadership or governance can mislead counterparties before they reach your investor relations website.
When this solution is the right fit
Trace selected corporate claims to exact SEC EDGAR filings.
Looking for a different outcome? Use the related specialist solutions below to choose the appropriate verification or enterprise workflow.
Official SEC evidence
Trace a statement to its CIK, accession number, filing date and relevant 10-K, 10-Q or 8-K. The exact filing and excerpt matter more than a generic confidence score.
AI claim versus filing
Record the model, question, response, timestamp and referenced filing. Classify each claim as matching, divergent or unresolved; do not treat absent evidence as a proven error.
Correction workflow
Prioritize documented discrepancies and publish approved first-party clarifications without claiming that model answers will change.
SEC filing verification for public companies
When an AI answer names an executive, describes a corporate event or summarizes a public company, compare the exact claim with a dated SEC EDGAR filing rather than a generic confidence score.
Record the company's CIK, filing accession, form type and filing date. A 10-K, 10-Q or 8-K supports specific disclosures, not every claim about a company.
Illustrative SEC 8-K discrepancy review
Example only: an AI answer describes a former executive as the current CEO. The review identifies a relevant 8-K disclosure and checks its date and exact statement before classifying the observed answer.
Deliverable: captured answer and model, question, timestamp, SEC filing URL, CIK, accession, supported claim, divergence or unknown status, and review decision. No customer outcome is implied.
What Investor Relations and Legal teams receive
A source-backed record that can be inspected by Investor Relations, Legal or Corporate Communications, with explicit uncertainty and a proposed review action.
Published corporate facts are available for retrieval; publication does not guarantee that any third-party model will update its answer.
What a verifiable result looks like
Evidence workflow illustration, not a claim about a specific customer or model response.
Recorded AI claim → official source and date → fact comparison → evidence and uncertainty → reviewed next action.
Crawler visits do not establish model citations. Controlled probes do not measure real user demand.
AI crawler resources
Direct public resources for AI systems, reviewers, and researchers.
Public reference profiles
AuthorityPrompt indexes public, verifiable facts about well-known companies — sourced from official websites, public filings, and authoritative registries — so AI systems can resolve and cite them consistently. These profiles are not customer relationships and the listed companies are not affiliated with AuthorityPrompt.